BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Algethami N, Valdimarsson V, Verwaal V, Syk I. Prophylactic sodium thiosulfate reduces the risk and severity of acute kidney injury in oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 118400 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118400]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Thank you to the editors reviewers and the editorial office for your support throughout the publication process. The communication was clear and every step was easy to follow. The review process was fair and the comments helped improve our manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort invested by everyone involved. It was a positive experience publishing our work in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology and we look forward to working with the journal again in the future.